Menu
opseu_caat_a.jpg

College Employer Council’s latest bulletin: more misinformation and double-speak – CAAT-A Negotiations Bulletin, Issue 13

College Employer Council’s latest bulletin: more misinformation and double-speak – CAAT-A Negotiations Bulletin, Issue 13

CAAT Academic
CAAT Academic
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

With their latest bulletin, the College Employer Council is once again misleading college faculty, students, and the Ontario public. They say their final offer will create full-time positions and increase faculty autonomy. In fact, it will do exactly the opposite.

Staffing grievances

False:

  • Council’s latest move would allow staffing grievances by removing the moratorium on Article 2.

True:

  • The moratorium on Article 2 expired, as was intended, with the last contract. The faculty team refused to sign Council’s requested extension of this concession.
  • Council’s offer allows the union to once more grieve for full-time positions under Article 2, but at the same time it drastically weakens Article 2 and makes it all but worthless.
  • Council’s offer makes it impossible to refer to part-time positions and their workloads when arguing for additional full-time faculty jobs.

Conversion of contract faculty

False:

  • Council’s final offer includes "improved conversion of contract faculty to full-time positions."

True:

  • Council’s offer introduces a precarious, contract faculty position that has never existed before. This "temporary full time" position would be a one-year contract, but with absolutely no job security. It could be cancelled at any time with two weeks’ notice.
  • The new position would allow colleges to shift contract faculty back and forth between sessional and temporary full-time status, meaning that a faculty member could do years of full-time academic work without ever getting a full-time job.
  • The employer's offer would expand the number of contract faculty in the college system and enable them to never have to hire a full-time faculty member again.
  • Their offer removes the provision through which sessional positions roll over into full time positions after one year.

Bill 148

False:

  • Council has a plan to respond to Bill 148, the Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act when it becomes law.

True:

  • Council’s plan is to avoid their Bill 148 obligations for as long as possible.
  • They refuse to include any proposed measures of Bill 148 at the table, which would immediately provide equity for partial-load members.
  • This could indefinitely delay the equity intentions of Bill 148.

Workloads

False:

  • Council’s final offer creates "more faculty autonomy over personal workloads."

True:

  • Council’s definition of “faculty autonomy” is not collegial governance or academic freedom. It means individual bargaining, which puts full-time faculty at risk.
  • Unlimited overtime allows the colleges to hire fewer full-time faculty.
  • If some full-time faculty do unlimited overtime, there may be pressure on others, such as probationary faculty, to also do this.

Students and bargaining

False:

  • A strike would be a terrible outcome for our students.

True:

  • The CAAT-A bargaining team remains committed to reaching a negotiated settlement and hopes that the strike deadline will provide a pressure point for Council to return to the table.
  • Council has refused to engage in any real bargaining to this point and have forced the union to set a strike deadline.
  • Faculty proposals have been crafted with students’ best interests in mind.
  • Academic freedom and collegial governance would protect the quality and integrity of college programs.
  • A stable full-time faculty complement and equity and security for contract faculty would also improve students’ learning conditions.

Voting on Council’s offer

False:

  • The union should “let faculty vote” on Council’s offer.

True:

  • The Colleges Collective Bargaining Act (CCBA) allows Council to bring a final offer directly to members without permission from the faculty bargaining team.
  • Council blames the faculty bargaining team for not “allowing” a vote on their offer.
  • Your bargaining team has been elected to bring an offer back to members that addresses your key demands and is one the team can recommend.
  • Council can bring any offer they want directly to the members: They do not need the faculty team to do that.

Intellectual property

False:

  • It is a gain for faculty to be able to discuss intellectual property issues and the definition of a Counsellor in subcommittees.

True:

  • Faculty and Council have been discussing intellectual property for the past three years in a subcommittee and no progress has been made.
  • Discussions in subcommittees are completely non-binding.
  • Referring an item to a subcommittee is a delaying tactic.

The bottom line

  • Council is moving away from settlement.
  • Council's final offer is much worse than the previous "extension agreement" they tabled in August and has introduced significant takeaways.
  • Council is seeking to increase inequality and precarious work.
  • Their offer will expand the number of contract faculty, reduce the number of full-time positions, and make contract positions even more precarious.
  • Council wants total control over academic decisions.
  • Council is rejecting faculty proposals that would introduce inclusive, democratic governance into the colleges, and ensure a voice for faculty and students in academic decision-making.
  • Council’s final offer will negatively impact students.
  • More precarious contract faculty means less time for faculty to spend with students.
  • No faculty or student input into academic decisions means lower quality and less student success.

Download this bulletin